It is about time...


Tech worker groups boycott IBM, Infosys, Manpower

Advocacy groups say the companies should look first for U.S. tech workers for U.S. IT jobs

Grant Gross

June 2, 2014 (IDG News Service)

Three U.S. tech worker groups have launched a labor boycott of IBM, Infosys and Manpower, saying the companies have engaged in a pattern that discourages U.S. workers from applying for U.S. IT jobs by tailoring employment ads toward overseas workers.

The companies should look first for U.S. workers to fill U.S. IT jobs, said representatives of Bright Future Jobs, the Programmers Guild and WashTech.

With the boycott, the three groups want to raise awareness of discriminatory hiring practices and put pressure on the three companies to consider U.S. IT workers for U.S. jobs, said Donna Conroy, director of Bright Future Jobs.

The main goals of the boycott are "attention getting" and putting pressure on the IT staffing firms to change their practices, Conroy said. With IT staffing agencies competing to fill U.S. positions, the companies contracting for their services may want to consider if the staffing firm "has a good reputation," she said.

The boycott should also raise concerns about staffing firms violating equal employment laws, said Les French, president of WashTech. "In addition to calling attention to an illegal practice, we want to show there are valid challenges to the 'labor shortage' of STEM workers," French said in an email.

An Infosys spokeswoman disputed the charges that it avoids recruiting U.S. IT workers.

"It is incorrect to allude that we exclude or discourage U.S. workers," she said by email. "Today, we are recruiting for over 440 active openings across 20 states in the U.S."

Many of the positions target people who have a U.S. master's degree in business administration for sales and management consultant jobs, she said. "The graduate hiring program is a key investment to strengthen our future leadership pool," she added. "Attracting the best and brightest talent is paramount to Infosys success."

The company's external job posts give "everyone an equal opportunity to apply," she added. The company supports several minority advocacy groups, she said.

Representatives from IBM and Manpower didn't respond to requests for comment on the boycott.

In some cases, a Manpower subsidiary has advertised for Indian IT workers to come to the U.S. for openings anticipated more than a year in advance, said Conroy, author of a white paper, released last week, that is focused on Manpower's IT recruitment efforts in India.

The advertisements in India are being placed even though "most Americans believe the nature of the tech industry is so fast-paced that staffing projections cannot be adequately foreseen," she said.

Meanwhile, Manpower is not advertising for U.S. IT positions on U.S. job portals, Conroy said. But if Manpower advertised in the U.S. using the same lead time it is using in India, it would give companies "plenty of time to seek Americans first."

In November 2013, Manpower subsidiary Experis IT India advertised in India for an OpenStack engineer for a U.S. position, Bright Future Jobs noted. "We are now hiring young, dynamic, skilled and experienced IT professionals from India to work with us in the U.S.," the ad said.

Other Experis IT India ads in late 2013 talked about the company filling out H-1B worker visa applications for job applicants, with one ad saying "all expenses related to your visa filing would be take care of" by Manpower.

The three tech workers groups also plan to launch an educational effort aimed at helping U.S. tech workers recognize discriminatory job ads and questions during job interviews, Conroy said. "When people are educated, there will likely be more lawsuits" related to discriminatory employment practices, she said.

Rajiv Dabhadkar, the founder of the National Organization for Software and Technology Professionals, a national tech advocacy organization in India, said he supports the boycott.

Indian employers show a "strong preference" for Indian IT workers, Dabhadkar said. He questioned why U.S. companies don't do the same thing.

The boycott "will protect the Indian foreign workers from the accusation of displacing Americans," he said. "Indians were not put on this earth to displace Americans, but Manpower's recruiting efforts show this is their plan."

Segregated recruiting opens the door to "unscrupulous agents" who make false promises to Indian IT workers, he added.

"The brokerage of intellectual capital drives down wages, and foreign workers are under paid," Dabhadkar said by email. "Multiple layers of broker agencies, that earn a per hour commission of their visa-sponsored employee creates a grey market."

Importing foreign workers to the U.S. as a commodity violates human rights, he added. "American employers gain competitive advantage and profitability by labor arbitrage, by paying low to their sponsored workers, and bidding high to their clients," Dabhadkar said.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is

Comments (7) -

United States Seeing things
June 6. 2014 05:48
Seeing things

But will the 100,000+ H4 visa holders boycott IBM, INFOSYS and MANPOWER?  these are the dependents of H1Bs who have applied for a green card and think they should be entitled to work...  They also think they are so talented they could work at the same jobs their spouse has as an H1b...  100,000+  Thanks, Obama.  They're submitting emotional arguments about how much they need to work at this government site  
search for USCIS-2010-0017-0001 and read the comments.  Add your own.  
I personally do not see 100,000+ jobs sitting around waiting for this.  They'll be going after the jobs my kid wants as a summer hire at a big box store.
You've been warned.

no site

United States Pissed off and angry
June 6. 2014 12:24
Pissed off and angry

@Seeing Things:

This is part of the corruption of their culture. A relative is just as qualified for a job as they are, but an American citizen isn't because "Americans are not qualified" for these jobs (to quote the idiot George Bush).

I hope the American businesses that hired these "Indian families" are satisfied with "clusterfuck" quality work...

no site

United States PolishKnightUSA
June 7. 2014 00:03

I was reading the websites behind the boycott and they were concerned that "women and minorities" were getting discriminated against.  Can you believe it?  After throwing white males under the bus, now THEY get thrown under too!

Indians succeed so well because they've figured out the race game masterfully (to their credit).  It's not racism provided it benefits those who aren't white.  They play the game better than other non-white race entitlement groups.  

Let's be honest here: How many years has the DMV been filled with non-whites and women who got the job due to their race and engaged in nepotism but since they voted Democrat, it was ok?  How many construction workers on roads sit on their butts but get away with it because the contract was "women and minority reserved?"  Indians didn't make the country into a third world nation, they just took it over after it had been transformed into one.

no site

United States US Tech Insurgent
June 7. 2014 15:26
US Tech Insurgent

IBM and Manpower/Experis, one in the same boat. IBM likes to use them to fill in the high turn over areas in IT. I had the displeasure of doing a contract with these scum. Same old story, one huge cluster of shipped in transient slumdogs messing everything up. The only plus side of that experience was later finding out the company axed the IBM contract and all those scum had to pack up and leave. Too bad they weren't all deported, nothing but frauds.

no site

United States Rat Pack
June 8. 2014 09:13
Rat Pack

Great news!  I'm just afraid that the slumdogs will retaliate with their usual cries of xenophobe/racist or the typical nonsense about companies needing the right to hire who they want, without governments telling them to hire US workers first.  That's usually how this shit goes.

no site

United States Boss
June 9. 2014 20:49

After Devyani Khobragade incident, now Preet Bharara is targeting Indian student visa fraudsters.

no site

United States Unemployed in Detroit
June 12. 2014 05:28
Unemployed in Detroit

One comment implied they were going after Indians because of "ideology"; Indians are master racketeers, with centuries of criminal gang experience we Americans cannot understand, they are so skilled at it. The moment someone from India gets arrested, a "defense" pops up that it is OK for Indians to commit crimes, using some fuzzy sounding straw man argument mixed in with Vivek Wadhwa style bloviating and gassing.

no site

Comments are closed

- Vineet Nayar, CEO, HCL Technologies

Recent Posts

Slumdog Comment Generator

Not Sure How To Respond?
Use the Slumdog Comment Generator!


«  November 2019  »
View posts in large calendar

Month List

The thoughts expressed on this blog may or may not be the author's own and are protected by the 1st Amendment. Any attempt to reveal his identity by contacting a slumdog hack at Google, or a corrupt Desi sys-admin at his ISP will be dealt with promptly and severely. Civil and criminal penalties may apply if one is found to have used private information in an attempt to get the author fired at the Hindu-only I.T. ghetto he currently works at. In addition, any Desi who attempts to burn the author's house down because they are enraged over his writing will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. This isn't India.

© Copyright 2019 Life of an I.T. Grunt

View My Stats